Friday, March 31, 2006

Democrat Rushes To Defense Of The Terrorists

Former Clinton aid John Podesta couldn't wait to defend the terrorists in this statement about the release of "hostage" Jill Carroll.

It is totally inappropriate to assume that her description of how she was treated is motivated by anything other than a desire to tell the truth.

According to Mr. Podesta it's "inappropriate" to believe that Ms. Carroll was actually treated a little worse than she claimed. Let's assume for a moment that she's not lying and really was a victim. On the video she was threatened with being beheaded. Is that being treated well? Has Mr. Podesta ever seen the video? Once again a democrat can't wait to be on the side of those who slaughtered 3,000 Americans on 9-11. When are we going to wake up and realize the democrats are just as much an enemy of the United States as al Qaeda?

Dumb Headline Of The Day

Brain Development and Intelligence Linked, Study Says

Who gets paid for theses "studies?"


Thursday, March 30, 2006

No Doubt About It Now

After reading this you'll be conviced that global warming is the number one crisis.

An unending series of March snowstorms pasted the Sierra in white, with one Lake Tahoe ski resort reporting more snowfall than during any other month over the last 35 years.

Somethings Fishy!

American "journalist" Jill Carroll was released by her kidnappers in Iraq yesterday. Funny how she heaps praise on her "captors."

Jill Carroll, who works for the Boston-based Christian Science Monitor, was abducted by unknown gunmen in west Baghdad on 7 January.

She told Iraqi television she had been treated well and was looking forward to being reunited with her family.

'Safe place'

However, she stressed that her captors treated her "very well".

"They never hit me. I was kept in a safe place with nice furniture, plenty of food. I was allowed to take showers," she said


You have to read all the way to the bottom of the article to find this out.

Ms Carroll was kidnapped in Baghdad's western Adil district while going to interview the senior Sunni Arab politician Adnan al-Dulaimi. Her interpreter was killed.

Interesting that she mentioned how "nice" the furniture was but not a word about the murder of her interpreter. Excuse me if I don't believe that Ms. Carroll was ever kidnapped. My money is on Ms. Carroll working hand in hand with the terrorists and she in effect "kidnapped" herself. All this for a little good publicity on how well the terrorists treat their "hostages."

A Somber Anniversary


25 years ago today John Hinckley Jr. attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan. Thankfully he wasn't successful as President Reagan went on to win the Cold War and turned around the economy from the "stagflation" years of Jimmy Carter.

New York Times Flat Out Lies

It's amazing at how the democrat run media will not only spin what's being said but now will just make it up as they go along to fit their anti-American agenda. The lies that democrat "journalist" Eric Lichtblau spews is stunning! As all clear thinking individuals know the warrentless wiretaps that the President has employed against al Qaeda is perfectly legal but that doesn't fit into al Qaeda supporter Mr. Lichtblau's agenda. Here is what he claims to have "heard" at the recent hearings about the NSA wiretaps.

Five former judges on the nation's most secretive court, including one who resigned in apparent protest over President Bush's domestic eavesdropping, urged Congress on Tuesday to give the court a formal role in overseeing the surveillance program.

In a rare glimpse into the inner workings of the secretive court, known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, several former judges who served on the panel also voiced skepticism at a Senate hearing about the president's constitutional authority to order wiretapping on Americans without a court order. They also suggested that the program could imperil criminal prosecutions that grew out of the wiretaps

Here is the full transcript of the hearings. You'll see that the judges said no such thing. In fact they said the opposite, that the President had full authority to wiretap Americans without a court order to collect foreign intelligence.

Following Senator Dubin's questions, Senator Hatch then pursued a series of hypothetical questions that he posed to Judge Kornblum regarding the admissibility of evidence obtained indirectly from the NSA surveillance program.

Judge Kornblum: To be admissible, the evidence would have had to have been lawfully seized or lawfully obtained and the standard that the district judge would use is that, depending upon where this is, is the law in his circuit. In most of the circuits, the law is clear that the President has the authority to do warrantless surveillance if it is to collect foreign intelligence and it is targeting foreign powers or agents. If the facts support that, then the district judge could make that finding and admit the evidence, just as they did in Truong-Humphrey.

It's truly amazing the depths that the democrats will go to support the terrorists and bring down this country.

Hap tip: Powerline

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Dumb Headline Of The Day

Texas police look in bars for signs of drunkenness

What brilliant investigative skills!

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

We're Not Worthy

According to democrat "journalist" Molly Ivins only "reporters" are allowed to have opinions.

Bloggers are not news-gatherers, but opinion-mongers. I have long argued that no one should be allowed to write opinion without spending years as a reporter -- nothing like interviewing all four eyewitnesses to an automobile accident and then trying to write an accurate account of what happened. Or, as author-journalist Curtis Wilkie puts it, "Unless you can cover a five-car pile-up on Route 128, you shouldn't be allowed to cover a presidential campaign."

According to Ms Ivins one has to be able to cover an accident before having an opinion. Let's put aside the absurdity of this for a moment. Tell me, how freakin difficult would it be to ask 4 people what happened and then write it down? This shows the intellectual vacancy of those on the left.




On The Lighter Side

This cracked me up. What kinds of foods do you think John Kerry requested when he was on the road? How about low fat strawberry and rasberry yogurt. Nothing like requesting a "fruit plate." Oh yeah, gotta have your "Poland Spring" bottled water. Not exactly the food of a real man now is it?

Associated Press Working For The Terrorists?

How long have I been insinuating that the democrat run press is working for al Qaeda? Here is a piece of enemy propaganda from the AP. I can't sum it up any better than biglizard so I'll just link to his site and copy this part of his analysis.

Accounts of the raid varied. Aides to the Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr and Iraqi police both said it took place at a mosque, with police claiming 22 bystanders died and al-Sadr's aides saying 18 innocent men were killed.

The Americans said Iraqi special forces backed by U.S. troops killed 16 "insurgents" in a raid on a community meeting hall after gunmen opened fire on approaching troops.

What is wrong with this picture? Take a second look at the second paragraph:
The Americans said Iraqi special forces backed by U.S. troops killed 16 "insurgents" in a raid on a community meeting hall after gunmen opened fire on approaching troops.

You noticed that too, eh? The Associated Press felt no qualms about allowing various Iraqis of dubious provenance to accuse American soldiers of brutally murdering 22 bystanders and 18 innocent men (a later graf makes it clear that is what Sadr's supporters allege we did); and AP didn't put scare quotes around those two descriptors. But they felt an overpowering urge to put little, curly doubt-indicators around the American military's description of those same dead guys as "insurgents."

Read the whole thing and then tell me that the democrat press isn't on the side of the terrorists.

Sunday, March 26, 2006

How Democrats Treat Our Heroes

Sometimes democrats can't help but act out. This case is especially despicable.

The heartbroken family of a fallen Bay State soldier was devastated yesterday to find his memorial defaced by callous anti-war vandals who scrawled “Oil” and “Christian Crusade” on a sign commemorating his sacrifice.

“I was enraged,” said Lou Petithory, whose son Daniel, 32, was killed in Afghanistan Dec. 5, 2001. “My main concern is that my son’s memory was attacked.”

But they "support the troops" right?

Can we question their patriotism yet?

Can We Call Him What He Is Yet?

Authorities have released the "suicide" note left by the Muslim graduate of the University of North Carolina that tried to run over several students with his car a couple of weeks ago. It's a bit long but well worth the read.

In the name of Allah, the merciful, the compassionate.

To whom it may concern:

I am writing this letter to inform you of my reasons for premeditating and attempting to murder citizens and residents of the United States of America on Friday, March 3, 2006 in the city of Chapel Hill, North Carolina by running them over with my automobile and stabbing them with a knife if the opportunities are presented to me by Allah.

I did intend to use a handgun to murder the citizens and residents of Chapel Hill, North Carolina but the process of receiving a permit for a handgun in this city is highly restricted and out of my reach at the present, most likely due to my foreign nationality.

I am a servant of Allah. I am 22 years of age and I was born in Tehran, Iran. My father, mother and older sister immigrated to the United States in 1985 when I was two years of age and I’ve lived in the United States ever since.

I attended elementary, middle and high school in North Carolina and I was accepted into the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. I began my college career in August 2001 and graduated in December 2005 with a bachelor’s degree in psychology and philosophy with Allah’s help.

I do not wish to pursue my career as a student any further because I have no desire to amass the impermanent and temporary fame and material wealth this world has to offer. However I made the decision to continue my studies and to graduate from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill so that the world will know that Allah’s servants are very intelligent.

Due to the killing of believing men and women under the direction of the United States government, I have decided to take advantage of my presence on United States soil on Friday, March 3, 2006 to take the lives of as many Americans and American sympathizers as I can in order to punish the United States for their immoral actions around the world.

In the Qur’an, Allah states that the believing men and women have permission to murder anyone responsible for the killing of other believing men and women. I know that the Qur’an is a legitimate and authoritative holy scripture since it is completely validated by modern science and also mathematically encoded with the number 19 beyond human ability. After extensive contemplation and reflection, I have made the decision to exercise the right of violent retaliation that Allah has given me to the fullest extent to which I am capable at present.

I have chosen the particular location on the University campus as my target since I know there is a high likelihood that I will kill several people before being killed myself or jailed and sent to prison if Allah wills. Allah’s commandments are never to be questioned and all of Allah’s commandments must be obeyed. Those who violate Allah’s commandments and purposefully follow human fabrication and falsehood as their religion will burn in fire for eternity in accordance with Allah’s will.

Sincerely yours,
Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar

Will anyone in the democrat run media call him a terrorist? If he's not a terrorist I don't know what one is.

Come to think of it I'm sure Yale is ready to accept him with a full scholarship as soon as he gets out of prison.

Hat tip: little green footballs

Thursday, March 23, 2006

Stunning Hypocrisy!

Republicans have come forth with an immigration plan. I have no problem with the democrats crying and whining like little 4 year old girls about it but this is just too much to stomach. Hillary Clinton must believe that the populace is incredibly stupid.

"It is certainly not in keeping with my understanding of the Scripture because this bill would literally criminalize the Good Samaritan and probably even Jesus himself," she said. "We need to sound the alarm about what is being done in the Congress."

I suppose sucking the brains out of unborn babies is "in keeping with her understanding of the Scripture?" I bet Jesus also agrees with Ms. Clinton that all navity scenes should be banned from public places. I wonder if the Hildabeast thinks Jesus agrees with her that the Boy Scouts should be dissolved because they require their membership to believe in a higher being? Not to mention that I'm positive Jesus agrees that all prayers in school (even a moment of silence) must be banned.

This incredible hypocrisy from the left is almost impossible to fathom!

Hat tip: Lorie Byrd

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Dumb Headline Of The Day

Girl loses right to wear Muslim clothing in school

Ok, since when is it a "right" to wear what one wants to school? I seem to remember that there were rules for what one could and couldn't wear to school. You could also categorize this headline as "bias headline of the day."

Hat tip: little green footballs

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

This Guy Was President?

Bill Clinton used to refer to himself as the first "Black President." Well, now, there is no question that he was our first "Metrosexual President."

WASHINGTON - After being surprised by her husband's role in the Dubai ports deal, Sen. Hillary Clinton has insisted that Bill Clinton give her "final say" over what he says and does, well-placed sources said.

The former President agreed to give his wife a veto to avoid his habit of making controversial headlines that could hurt her chances of returning to the White House, multiple sources told the Daily News.

"Hillary has final say," said the adviser, and the ex-President's staff has been warned not to do or say anything without running it by the senator's handlers

"That was true in the White House during the [2000] Senate campaign," recalled another longtime aide who stayed close to the ex-President after he left office. "If he said the sky was blue and she said the sky was purple, then the sky was purple."

I don't know about any of you but I want my President to have a backbone. If he can't stand up to his own wife is it really a surprise that North Korea cheated on the nuclear agreement and built the bomb? Is it any surprise that bin Laden thought we were a "paper tiger" when Slick Willy pulled our troops out of Somalia? Now we understand why he sold nuclear secrets to the Chinese. The man is a spineless coward and henpecked to boot.

More "Anti-War" Protests


My favorite "blogger" who covers these "anti-war" protests is Zombie. He's a frequent commenter at little green footballs and the only thing I know about him is that he is a reformed "leftist" and that his appearance lets him fit right in with the moonbats. I chose these two pictures from his site to show the insanity on the left. I guess now the democrats are claiming Bush is the shooter who killed JFK and what's an "anti-war" rally without some good old anti-Semitism?

Notice the signs in the background in the first photo. "Support the Iraqi Resistance." These democrats come right out and admit to supporting those who slaughtered 3,000 innocent Americans on 9-11. But they "support the troops" right? Please check out all of Zombies pictures on his site.

Can we question their patriotism yet?

Monday, March 20, 2006

Update

Here is that HUGE anti war rally in Arizona that drew all of 2 people.

I have to say, I haven't laughed like that in I don't know how long!

Not The Dumbest Headline Of The Day But Definately The Funniest!

War protest at Hayworth office draws 2

How funny is that? An anti war rally that drew all of 2 people. Bwahahahaha!!!!!

How Democrats Feel About The Taliban

As we've all heard by now a former Taliban spokesman is attending Yale University. This from the subscription "online political journal," (sorry no link)

"This young Taliban dude sounds more qualified than most of my classmates and I were. I mean, he speaks four languages!... One wouldn't have wanted Yale to admit former Nazi leaders after World War II. But I am sure Yale enrolled some students who fought for, or somehow abetted, the Third Reich. Perhaps Islamofascists shouldn't get the privilege of studying at Yale, but the determination about this particular young man was for the admission office to make. To think that his admission is a matter of national concern is to take him, and Yale, way too seriously" -- Mark Oppenheimer, a Yale alumnus and current editor of the New Haven Advocate, discussing Yale's admission of former Taliban official Sayed Rahmatullah Hashemi.

Gee, I wonder how the nation would have felt if Joseph Goebbels, the infamous Nazi propagandist were enrolled at Yale after WWII?

What is it with democrats and their love and affection for ruthless genocidal lunatics?

Useful Idiots

Sunday, March 19, 2006

Democrats Seething Rage Against Our Military

Actor Richard Belzer was on Bill Mahr's HBO show Real Time. Along side the democrat was a woman who's stepson was fighting in Iraq. Here are a few snippets of the conversation. The first comment from Belzer is in relation to our soldiers.

“That's bullshit: ask them! They're not, they don't read twenty newspapers a day. They're under the threat of death every minute. They're not the best people to ask about the war because they're gonna die any second.”

Wow, so according to Belzer soldiers know nothing about war. I guess baseball players know nothing about baseball, engineers know nothing about engineering, and dentists know absolutely nothing about teeth.

Here's a comment from the democrat about how intelligent our soldiers are.

“You think everyone over there is a college graduate? They're 19 and 20-year-old kids who couldn't get a job-”

Ah, all soldiers are stupid rednecks right Richard? Oooops, looks like Ms. Ros-Lehtinen's stepson doesn't fit into the democrats preconceived notions.

“He's a college graduate. He's a Marine officer. He volunteered for the Marines.”

Can someone explain to me the irrational hatred democrats have for our military?

But they "support the troops" right?

Can we question their patriotism yet?

Saturday, March 18, 2006

Dumb Headline Of The Day

Boswell says offensive in Iraq could be good or bad

Way to take a stand there Mr. Boswell.

Attention All Gun Owners, Please Report To The Mayor Of Chicago And Turn In Your Weapons

I used to have a bit of a soft spot for Mayor Daley of Chicago. He appeared to be an old school democrat in the mold of a Scoop Jackson. Tough on national security and crime while "progressive" on social issues. But now it looks as if the good Mayor has completely lost his mind like most democrats. Here is his reaction to two young girls who were gunned down recently in Chicago.

Daley also demanded that the state's 1.5 million law-abiding firearm owners travel to Chicago to appear before him and explain why their firearms should not be banned and confiscated.

Not only does the Mayor want to grab all the guns from law abiding citizens in Chicago but now he wants to take all of the states gun owners weapons away. I wonder if he understands that even if all 1.5 million REGISTERED gun owners turned in their weapons that those 2 young victims would still be dead? Instead of blaming the weekend hunters for these homocides why doesn't he clean up his own damn city? Can someone tell me why democrats demand that only criminals have guns?

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Oh Boy, Another One

Looks like ABC can't count to 3 either. Here's their headline.

After Four Years, Withdrawl Elusive

Dumb Headline Of The Day

After Four Years, Iraq Withdrawal Elusive

The irrational hatred of the United States by the democrat run Associated Press has produced this doozy. Let's see, the war started in March of 2003, this is March of 2006. I may have not done too well in math but everytime I subtract 2003 from 2006 I come up with 3. Can you believe something so simple wasn't caught by the "journalist" or any of the "editors?"



New York Times Working For Al Qaeda?

It sure looks like it. Here is some more enemy propaganda, the difference is the Times completely made up this story. You know it's bad when another far left "news" outlet catches you in a lie.

The online magazine Salon is challenging the identity of a man profiled by The New York Times in a front-page article on Saturday who says he is the iconic hooded figure in a published photograph who was abused by Americans at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003 and 2004.

Salon bases its challenge on an examination of a set of 280 Abu Ghraib photographs it has been studying for several weeks and an interview with an official of the Army's Criminal Investigation Command, known as the C.I.D., who says the man identified by The Times is not the detainee in the photograph.

On Monday, Chris Grey, chief spokesman for the investigations unit, asked about the challenge, confirmed to The Times in an e-mail message: "We have had several detainees claim they were the person depicted in the photograph in question. Our investigation indicates that the person you have is not the detainee who was depicted in the photograph released in connection with the Abu Ghraib investigation.

How long is it going to take the public to figure out that the democrat run media is not only rooting for the perpetrators of 9-11 but most likely have an operational relationship with them as well? The irony is that an American "peace activist" was tortured and murdered but that story only made it to page 8 of the same issue. And where did this "correction" or more accurately the fact the Times was caught lying in an attempt to smear our brave men and women in uniform appear? Why, on page 17 of course.

Hat tip: Best of the Web

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Who's Side Are They On

Once again the democrat run media not only lies but outright propagandizes for the perpetrators of 9-11. One of the few independent journalists Jack Kelly has it exactly right. Comparing what the Washington Post says and the facts on the ground are not only different they are worlds apart.

The Washington Post reported on Feb. 25 that 120 Sunni mosques had been attacked in retaliation for the destruction of the Golden Mosque, holy to the Shiites. In a March 3 news conference, Gen. George Casey, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, said:

"We can confirm attacks on about 30 mosques around the country, with less than 10 of those mosques moderately damaged, and only two or three severely damaged. We visited eight mosques (in Baghdad) that were reportedly damaged. We found one broken window in those eight mosques."

How could the media get it so wrong? Who are the only ones who want a civil war in Iraq? Who benefits when the Washington Post lies? Al Qaeda does, that's who. What drives these democrats to help those who slaughtered 3000 innocent Americans on 9-11? Are they ideological soulmates? Is it an incurable case of Bush Derangement Syndrome? Is it an irrational hatred of the United States?

Jack Kelly sums it up well:

There is sectarian violence in Iraq -- as there is in India, the Philippines, Indonesia, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, Northern Ireland -- but no civil war....

There is no civil war in Iraq, but al-Qaida would dearly love to provoke one. Knowledge of that fact should make journalists more careful about separating rumor from fact. But many apparently have chosen instead to act as the propaganda arm of our enemies.

Hat tip: Newsbusters




Monday, March 13, 2006

Dumb Headline Of The Day

Amateur body piercing dangerous: pediatrician

I could have told you that using a nail gun to pierce your lip is dangerous.

Saturday, March 11, 2006

Hollywood Supports Terrorists

I knew eventually that the democrats in Hollywood would make a pro terrorist movie.

The directors of the The Matrix make a movie where the hero is a faceless terrorist trying to blow up London. Yes, you read that right

Is it possible for a major Hollywood studio to make a $50 million movie in which the hero is a terrorist? A terrorist who appears wearing the dynamite waistcoat of a suicide bomber, and who utters the line--from beneath a full-face wooden mask that he never takes off--"Blowing up a building can change the world"? A movie written and produced by the Wachowski brothers, the cyberauteurs who created The Matrix? Starring Natalie Portman, shaved as bald as Demi Moore in G.I. Jane?

These are not rhetorical questions. V for Vendetta, set for release March 17, is that movie, and it is the most bizarre Hollywood production you will see (or refuse to see) this year. It's the kind of film that makes you ask questions like, Who thought this was a good idea?

Well, at least the Hollywood democrats aren't hiding their true feelings. Now if only the rest of the democrats would follow suit and admit their vicious hatred of the United States and their wish that the country as we know it be destroyed.

Can we question their patriotism yet?

Another Bogus Poll

You have to wonder why the democrat run media continues to lie with regards to their "polling?" The newest bogus poll is by AP/Ipsos. With glee they report that President Bush's approval rating is at an all time low.

The poll suggests that most Americans wonder whether Bush is up to the job. The survey, conducted Monday through Wednesday of 1,000 people, found that just 37 percent approve of his overall performance. That is the lowest of his presidency.

Sounds pretty bad huh? I guess the democrats over at AP/Ipsos hope that you'll just take their word for it. I'm not sure if they think you're stupid or if they don't care and will print any kind of propaganda to help the democrat party. Let's take a look at WHO was surveyed.

As you can see the most striking statistic is that of those surveyed 51% consider themselves democrats while only 39% consider themselves Republicans. (when "leaners" are tabulated) As we all know from the 2004 presidential election 37% of voters claim to be democrats and 37% claim to be Republicans. Well then, it's not so hard to figure out how they came up with that 37% approval rating now is it?

You would think that such an obviously biased poll would be shunned by all clear thinking individuals but since it's bad news for Republicans it's being reported by abc,cbs,nbc,cnn,msnbc,cnbc,npr, etc.................. Sooner or later the major media outlets will have to apply to be democrat 527's and record their air time as campaign contributions to the democrat party.

Hat tip: Ankle biters

Dumb Headline Of The Day

Judge to tell teachers:
No sex with students

Tell me, does it really take a judge to explain to teachers not to have sex with their students?

Democrats Perceived Superiority

To watch the smugness and self righteousness of some democrats can be infuriating at times. Here is what democrat "journalist" Gene Weingarten from the Washington Post has to say about Conservatives.

I think it is easier to be a conservative. You do not have to think as much, beause issues are more black and white. That delivers a sense of general contentment, because the world seems more orderly.

I think there are very intelligent, deep-thinking conservatives, but I also think it is easier for a dumb, incurious, narrowminded person to be a conservative than to be a liberal.

This is the height of intellectual laziness by Mr. Weingarten. What does it take to be a liberal? There is only one prerequistite, to blame America. Who's to blame for 9-11? America. Who's to blame for poverty in the third world? America. Who's to blame for high gas prices? America. Who's fault is it that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons? America. Gene, tell me how "dumb, incurious, and narrowminded" is it to blame America for everything?

You have to wonder if these far left wing pointy headed "intellectuals" actually believe the tripe that comes out of their mouths.

Democrats Hate Poor People

Thomas Friedman who is your average everyday democrat "journalist" from the New York Times had this to say about the price of oil.

"Well, of course if you're talking about the oil weapon, you know, from my own personal perspective, Charlie, they cut off oil and oil went to $100 a barrel that would make my day. Because the sooner we go to $100 a barrel, the sooner we're going to have everyone in America driving a plug-in hybrid car fueled by corn and ethanol. And I think that would be a great thing and that would ultimately free us from having to worry about these people."

Let me get this straight Mr Friedman, It would "make your day" if oil went to $100 a barrel? A rough translation would be about $4.25 for a gallon of gas if oil were to go that high. Who will that hurt the most? Does Tom think that Bill Gates or George Soros will be hurt by that price? Hell, that won't affect me much. It's the poor who will be hurt if that were to happen. Does Mr. Friedman really get his jollies from watching the poor struggle?

Remember this when you hear some democrat blather on about alternative energy. Ask them what it is about watching the poor struggle that turns them on so much?

Friday, March 10, 2006

Hooverville

Another healthy jobs number today.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. employers added a stronger-than-forecast 243,000 jobs in February

Employers have increased payrolls every month for the past 2-1/2 years, a sign the economy is vigorous enough to keep
Federal Reserve policy-makers on edge about the pace of wage and price rises.

Average hourly earnings grew 0.3 percent during February, in line with expectations, but in the 12 months through February pay rose by 3.5 percent, which department officials said was the highest annual increase since September 2001.

Wow! I thought the democrats said that the only jobs left in America were burger flippers? I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell ya that democrats would lie to us. It's amazing that an entire political party must root against America to gain power. Of course rooting against Americas interests is inherent in democrats anyway.

Thursday, March 09, 2006

More Democrat Hatred Of Our Military


Check out these stunning statistics involving desertion in our armed forces.

The Army, Navy and Air Force reported 7,978 desertions in 2001, compared with 3,456 in 2005.

The Marine Corps showed 1,603 Marines in desertion status in 2001. That had declined by 148 in 2005.


The desertion rate was much higher during the Vietnam era. The Army saw a high of 33,094 deserters in 1971--3.4% of the Army force. But there was a draft and the active-duty force was 2.7 million.


Desertions in 2005 represent 0.24% of the 1.4 million U.S. forces.


What kind of headline would you expect from this fantastic news? Something like "Desertions Plummets Under Bush?" Or "Desertions Low Ever Since 9-11?" Oh no, we can't have that, this is the democrat run USA Today after all. Take a gander at the headline of the article that includes these statistics.

8,000 desert during Iraq war

Unbelieveable isn't it? Somehow democrats are able to hammer our military while providing positive information.

Hey, but they "support the troops" don't they?

Dumb Headline Of The Day

Sex and Intoxication More Common Among Women on Spring Break, According to AMA Poll

You just can't make this stuff up.

Democrats Support bin Laden

Democrat and former State Department dipolomat Ann Wright shares her admiration and support for Osama bin Laden in this audio clip. You can hear fellow democrats clapping as she heaps praise on the mastermind of 9-11.

I've always known that democrats have a seething rage and irrational hatred for the United States but even I didn't think they would come right out and support the events of 9-11. Makes you wonder how many top level democrats were involved with the planning and execution that resulted in the slaughter of 3,000 innocent Americans on that bright September morning.

Can we question their patriotism yet?

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Your're Not Going To Believe What Democrats Are Blaming America For Now

After reading this headline I thought to myself the democrats and the media are finally catching on to the despicable regime in Cuba

UN envoy alarmed at Cuba jail allegations

So, democrats finally have figured out the Cuba isn't the workers paradise they have thought it is for all these decades. But guess whos fault it is? You got it, the United States of course. You just can't make this stuff up.

GENEVA (Reuters) - A special U.N. rights envoy expressed alarm on Tuesday at allegations of ill treatment in Cuban jails, but said that a U.S. economic embargo was hampering attempts to improve Cuba's respect for political rights.

"The extreme tension between Cuba and the United States has created a climate which is far from conducive to the development of freedom of expression and freedom of assembly," French magistrate Christine Chanet said.


Someone has to explain to me how the American embargo has anything to do with the respect of political rights in Cuba? The America hating psychosis of democrats has hit a new level in this article.

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Defending Bennish

Not that this is much of a surprise but democrats and the media are defending the anti American rantings of moonbat Jay Bennish. Here is a taste of this high school "teachers" anti Americanism.

Listen, between the years 1960 and 1962, the United States through the CIA conducted over 7,000 terrorist sabotage attacks against the small island nation of Cuba. Over 7,000 terrorist attacks were waged against just one little country called Cuba in a two year period, intentionally, let me rephrase that, intentionally blowing up medical supplies, intentionally burning down crops that feed their country, thereby creating starvation, right? Intentionally trying to make that system collapse. And we're willing to expend however many thousands of people died because we just want to get rid of Castro. And the sad reality is that there are some policy planners who are willing to let people die in order to achieve their objectives.

You can listen to the audio tape here.

According to NBC and Matt Lauer who's fault is it that Mr. Bennish is a stark raving mad lunatic? Why it's the high school student who taped him of course.

Lauer: "They shopped it around to conservative media outlets and finally released it to one and created an uproar. On the tape you can hear Sean Allen [the student in question] asking you questions that seem to be egging you on a little bit. Do you feel you were set up?"

Now, let's see how the democrat organization The World Can't Wait has to say. This group of liberals actually have a petition for Mr. Bennish to keep his job.

At a time when critical thought and dissent are under attack and a chilling atmosphere looms over academia, the suspension and possible firing of Jay Bennish demands nation-wide, public opposition. At a time when someone like University of Colorado Ethnic Studies Professor Ward Churchill can be systematically attacked - in the media and by people within the government - and nearly forced to resign for political statements he has made, a precedent allowing for the same or worse for a public high school teacher must not be allowed!

A large portion of the democrat party has become so unhinged that they are actually letting their vicious hatred of the United States overcome their common sense. This rage against everything this country was founded on has become a psychosis. The problem is they want to infect our children with their mental illness.



Dumb Headline Of The Day

Study suggests small children, big dogs don't mix

What would we do without "studies?"

Monday, March 06, 2006

Tired Of All The Whining

After reading and hearing about how "Brokeback Mountain" got screwed out of an Oscar I thought I needed to let the 97% of heterosexual men who I'd like to see in a "romantic" movie.

Just in case you just woke up after sleeping for the last year "Brokeback Mountain" was a story about 2 gay Sheepherders, but since being a Sheephearder was even too gay for Hollywood they called them "Cowboys."

Democrats Lose A Big One

Not being able to hide their hatred for the military democrats have attempted to kick off military recruiters from college campuses and still receive government money. I know this is absurd and the Supreme Court obviously agreed, the vote was unanimous. Even far left wing moonbat Justice Ginsberg voted against the democrats.

Hat tip: Michelle Malkin

I'm Back

I couldn't justify spending any money on a site because I'm not sure how much time I'll have to devote to it. This site is free to use. I hope to get back my loyal readers soon.